|
"Men stumble over the
truth from time to time,
but most pick themselves up and hurry
off as if nothing happened."
Sir Winston Churchill
British politician (1874 - 1965)

From the Desk of Floyd W. Upperman Jr.
My new email address is
floyd@upperman.com. |
Good evening
everyone!
Welcome to
spring! Out here however, it still feels like
winter. We have not made the transformation
yet. I am looking forward to it however.
Interest
rates and the shape of things to come!
This is
an unusual time in the markets and uncertain
time in the U.S. economy in my opinion. We are
in the midst of a bull market in commodities
that began at the lows in the late nineties
(which I wrote about in 1998 in a special report
on the upcoming bull market in commodities). In
addition we are likely in a bear market in
stocks which won't become apparent however until
we are much lower in price. However as I have
also said I believe we may enter into a period
similar to 1963 - 1983 where for 20 years stock
prices did nothing basically but move sideways
in a large range. The only difference here
(between that period and this one) is that stock
prices in the Dow and S&P500 for example could
actually decline for the better part of the 20
year period as well (similar for example to
Japan from 1990 - 2005). Thus this is obviously
not the 1990's anymore!!! There's some strange
occurrences right now too. Lets discuss.
I find the current IMPA data in Ten year notes
and US bonds very perplexing at this time. The
current net-com position is at extreme high
levels (EUCL) in both Ten year notes and US
bonds. The level of EUCL penetration in TY is
quite astonishing in my opinion as well. The
net-com in TY for example has gone from a low of
-16,678 on October 26th 2004 (price of 113.80)
to the current new record high of +508,893
(price of 108.72) on March 15th 2005. Its
going to be very interesting to see how this
large net-com position is resolved (I'll be
watching this very closely). Overall I have not
anticipated rates coming down in 2005, but this
data seems to be suggesting they will ! Thus
its suggesting lower rates later in 2005, not
higher rates! Thus we have to ask - What
would cause that? Something unexpected perhaps
(such as a terrorist attack) but no one of
course knows when or if that might occur. The
other event that could cause rates to fall would
be an economic slow down or recession, which I
believe is very possible as the U.S. economy is
very vulnerable right here in my opinion. In
fact, I am more concerned about the U.S. economy
today than ever, period. I don't think the
economy is all that strong and the strength that
is there isn't all that sustainable in my
opinion (it is far to consumer driven).
Economic
conditions in the U.S. may not be as healthy as
many think. In fact there are some warning
signs that the economy is actually on the verge
of a possible collapse! What's holding it up?
Consumer consumption and world-wide confidence
in the U.S. economy and currency (dollar) even
in the face of a mountain of growing debt and
weak currency. As I have discussed in the past
however, if for some reason this confidence is
seriously disturbed the result could be
devastating. Confidence perhaps is the only
thing that keeps everything from falling apart
with the U.S. economy. Confidence is crucial in
a society who's currency is backed up with
nothing more than a promise.
Many
changes have taken place in the last 30 years
which have only recently come full-circle in my
opinion. And changes in the last 5-10 have
changed my overall longer-term outlook on the
possibility that the U.S economy could seriously
falter in my life-time (and possibly over the
next 5-10 years). There are obvious serious
issues with sky-rocketing health costs and
insurance as well as government programs such as
social security and Medicaid, which are nothing
more than government run ponzi schemes in my
opinion (paying new money out to older
contributors).
Free
trade in recent years has also brought the world
closer and along with technology has improved
transparency greatly. In addition over the last
50 years America has changed from a producing
economic power following WW11 to a consuming
economic power accelerated in recent years due
to the creation of massive amounts of temporary
wealth. This is what I call false wealth. Let
me give you an example. The run up in dot.com
stocks during the nineties created roughly 4
trillion dollars in false wealth. The almighty
U.S. consumer fed the false wealth right back
into the same system, fueling prices higher and
higher while pushing consumer credit debt higher
and higher. As paper profits continued to rise
the consumer continued to spend more and more,
dumping money right back into the same arena
(software, electronics, computers and so on)
which kept the dot.com's fueled for awhile.
However this could not continue for long. The
pundits all said it would continue for many
years and was different "this time". They all
had intelligent reasons as to why that would be
so - but as history has proven time and time
again, speculative frenzies always end the same
way!
The
Nasdaq dot-com bubble burst and the trillions
evaporated into thin air almost as quickly as
they appeared, leaving U.S. consumers holding
the bag (with mounting debt). With the economy
soon in recession following the Nasdaq bubble
the Fed raced to the rescue lowering interest
rates to all time lows (Fed Funds). Short-term
this was not a bad idea, however the longer-term
consequences were unclear at the time. The Fed
perceived the risks to be higher on the
short-term and thus moved quickly to lower
interest rates (following 9/11). This was done
in conjunction with one of the largest U.S. tax
cuts (for the most wealthy) in history. This
equated to a massive shot in the arm for the
economy and the result was as expected! The
consumer kept on spending and a new wealth
affect now appears to have been created in my
opinion - A bubble in real estate prices.
Real
estate prices have risen pretty substantially
now across the country and we are now faced with
a serious potential bubble in real estate which
could in my opinion deflate like the Nasdaq if
rates were to rise to quickly. Even if rates
rise gradually eventually this will choke off
the demand and leave many U.S. consumers holding
the bag again (those buying at the top). The
market appears to be in a frenzy not unlike the
Nasdaq in 1999 at this point which means we
could have a little more room on the upside.
However at some point I think we're going to see
a top. The Fed appears more and more concerned
about this issue and that is precisely why they
are taking "baby steps" with the rate hikes in
my opinion. However what has Greenspan and the
Fed perplexed as well as myself is the unusual
disconnect between stable long-term rates and
rising short-term rates. The Fed has raised the
short-term rate (Fed Funds) from 1% to 2.5% but
the long-term rates have held steady and
actually declined for part of the time (when
they should have risen by most accounts). This
indicates some other force is overriding the fed
manipulation basically and its unclear what it
is! But it is showing up in the COT data as
well via the record size net-com EUCL
penetration in the TY and near record amount of
UCL penetration in US Bonds as well. More than
likely its SPECULATION in derivatives from the
endowments, pensions and so on who also have a
huge stake in the real estate bubble
continuing! If the bubble burst and consumers
can't pay back the debt the consumers can go
default which could transfer the bag to the
holders of Freddie mac Fannie mae mortgage
backed securities (and derivatives tied to
mortgage instruments and so on) which have all
benefited from massive amounts of refinancing in
the mortgage industry and huge mortgages many
consumers now hold (due to the run up in prices
and rampant speculating in these markets,
similar to the Nasdaq in about 1999 I'd
estimate). If this happens the entire stack of
cards known as the U.S. economy could come
crumbling down in my opinion. I've never said
this before in the past, there's never been any
reason to be so concerned about such an unlikely
event in my opinion. Today however there is, as
its no longer that unlikely in my opinion.
The U.S.
economy is no longer an economy driven by
production as today is driven by its consumers.
The symptoms of this can be seen in the
import/export data and in consumer debt.
Consumer spending exploded in the nineties with
the run up in stock market prices creating a
"wealth affect". And the "wealth affect" is
still occurring today except today its being
driven in wealth generated by the real estate
market. In both cases however, whether wealth
from non existent profits in high-tech companies
(many of which are totally deflated today) or
wealth from profits gained in surging hyped-up
real estate prices, both are a symptom of
consumption (buying stocks or buying real
estate) and both are not ideal candidates for
sustaining an economy. The bubble in the tech
stocks already burst as we know (and knew about
ahead of time via our IMPA). The bursting of
this bubble and the decline in high-flying tech
stocks that followed resulted in nearly $4
trillion dollars of newly generated wealth
simply evaporating into the thin air it came
from! And now the same thing is happening
across the country in the hottest real estate
area's. Today's U.S. real estate market is
worth more than all stocks traded on the stock
market!
Bottom line - If the American consumer keeps on
spending and borrowing at the present pace (for
real estate or whatever) the dollar could also
be affected and it could eventually lose its
status in international finance as the world's
preferred reserve currency. This could be the
event that causes confidence in the U.S. economy
to falter and may eventually bring down this
stack of cards (U.S. economy). All these things
coming together and happening at the same time
(social security, weakening dollar, real estate
bubble and so on) are putting significant
pressure on the economy and testing world-wide
confidence in the U.S. to resolve these issues
and remain the gold standard for the world...
Did I mention Gold?? - If
there was ever a time to own some gold, NOW is
the time in my opinion - I'll repeat that - Now
(for the long-term) is the time to own some
GOLD! I've never been a "gold bug" per sae but
I have slowly been turning into one since the
late nineties and of course bought when the IMPA
was bullish at the bottom in the late nineties
(1999). However I sold some of that during the
run up in 2003 - 2004 and have been buying to
replenish what I sold as I believe gold is now
one of the better assets to hold! The prospects
for the dollar looking forward may not be good
in my opinion nor is the prospects for price
stability here in the U.S.
Floyd Upperman
March 20th 2005
SPECIAL! TRIAL ACCESS For only $9! 30-day
access to the vault!
For a limited time, we are providing a 30-day $9
trial to the service!
Click here for the Trial Access ($9 for
30-days)!
|